Archive for the 'Newslinks' Category

Newslinks: Monday, July 23

Tuesday, June 24th, 2008

Le bassin aux nympheas by Monet via BBC News

Rarely seen Monet is up for auction at Christie’s [BBC]
–>
Berlin as a new artistic and cultural capital of Europe? [NYTimes]
–>
Jeff Koons joins Gucci jury for Venice film festival in September [Variety]
–>
The ‘Artek Pavilion,’ sold as an art piece by Sotheby’s, can be used as display space for collectors[NYSun]
–>
“Louise Bourgeois: the Spider, the Mistress and the Tangerine” showing at New York’s Film Forum [Film Forum]
–>
16 Young British Artists reunite in London for “Freeze 20”[ArtInfo]

Disney Online Gets Down to Kid Business.

Chicago Tribune (Chicago, IL) May 11, 2003 Byline: John Schmeltzer May 11–So much for the neighborhood lemonade stand.

Instead, if the folks at Disney Online have their way, kids ages 9 to 12 will be spending even more time in front of the computer, learning business techniques they can use to leverage their way into larger endeavors. in our site hot shot business

Disney, in cooperation with the Kansas City, Mo.-based Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, has rolled out Hot Shot Business, in which kids can open their own virtual pet spa, skateboard factory or comic strip. Once open for business they are forced to react quickly to demanding customers or big news to remain in business.

“Hot Shot Business is intended to plant the seed among kids that being an entrepreneur is a real option–an option that not only provides opportunities for them, but benefits for their communities and our nation,” said Carl Schramm, president and chief executive of the foundation, which seeks to promote entrepreneurship and improve the education of children.

Ken Goldstein, executive vice president and managing director of Disney Online, said Disney saw the game as an opportunity to match its creativity with the foundation’s small-business message. website hot shot business

“Our production team really ran with the concept. And the kids who have tested Hot Shot Business for us have given it rave reviews,” he said.

Schramm, who believes the game will make the lemonade stands he grew up with a thing of the past, said the game will help prepare the country’s next generation of business owners and leaders.

Newslinks: Monday, June 23, 2008

Monday, June 23rd, 2008


–>
Marlene Dumas fromThe New York Times

Marlene Dumas, most expensive living woman artist at auction (until recently exceeded by Bourgeois) coming to MOMA in December [NYTimes Mag]
–>
How the proliferation of private museums affects the buyer/dealer system [The Independent]
–>
A reduced-size Antony Gormley ‘Angel of the North’ a Bacon, a Basquiat, a Richter coming on the block at Sotheby’s [Artinfo]
–>
Profile of Lauren Cornell, director of New Museum website: Rhizome [TimeoutNY]
–>
Herzog & de Meuron to design new museum of modern art in Calcutta [The Arts Newspaper]
–>
The art works Jeff Koons collects [NYTimes]
–>
Update: New York Mag covers the Shafrazi show,[NYMag] covered by AO here [AO]
–>
FT’s Jackie Wullschlager reviews Royal Academy Exhibition in London [Financial Times]

UPSCALE EATERY COMING TO S.E. 164TH

The Columbian (Vancouver, WA) May 2, 2001 | JULIA ANDERSON, Columbian staff writer A fine-dining restaurant is set to open this summer near the fastest-growing area of east Vancouver.

Lloyd Taylor, a longtime area businessman, has signed a deal to put a 180-seat restaurant-lounge on the upper level of South View Center, being constructed northwest of Southeast 164th Avenue and Southeast 34th Street.

The restaurant, to be called Bacchus, will feature a rustic brick interior with terraced dining, fireplace and open lounge area.

Executive chef and general manager Kevin Connell said the restaurant’s lunch menu will offer items ranging from $5 to $14 with dinner prices from about $18 to $32. this web site oasis day spa

He said naming the restaurant Bacchus after the Roman god of wine lends itself to the approach he will take with its menu.

“Instead of planning the food then matching wine to it, we’ll regularly choose wines and match menu items to the wine,” he said. Connell expects the menu to offer seasonal items, seafood, even game with a fresh, light presentation.

Thomas Andersen, a business partner of Taylor, will be the restaurant’s entertainment and event coordinator.

“Our hope is to bring a mix of talent to the lounge including jazz, salsa dance, blues and maybe dinner-theater,” Andersen said.

The restaurant is expected to employ about 55. Developers are hoping for a mid-July opening Taylor, who has operated the Rent Town USA retail chain for 20 years, said owning and operating a restaurant has been a lifelong dream.

“I feel very confident about the project because of the experienced team we’ve put together here,” Taylor said. “We’re also very excited about the location with the high traffic on 164th and demographics of the area. The buzz here is that a restaurant like this is overdue.” Residential growth in the past five years, just east and north of South View makes the area the fastest-growing in the county.

The restaurant will occupy a second-level space in the retail project. From that height, the views of Portland and Mount Hood are “amazing,” said Taylor.

Pam Lindloff, sales associate with Norris, Beggs & Simpson, said other tenants signed for the project include Oasis Day Spa. An IHOP restaurant is planned on the northeast corner, a Knowledge Beginnings day care center is already operating on its north end and a Texaco station is located on the south end. see here oasis day spa

Lindloff said she’s negotiating to bring a bakery, nail salon, dry cleaner and possibly a deli-sandwich outlet to the remaining 26,000 square feet in the project.

AT A GLANCE WHAT: Bacchus restaurant OFFERING: Upscale menu with wine cellar and live entertainment WHERE: 3200 S.E. 164th Ave., east Vancouver OWNER: Lloyd Taylor DEVELOPMENT COST: About $1 million OPENING: mid-July JULIA ANDERSON, Columbian staff writer

Newslinks: Thursday June, 19 2008

Thursday, June 19th, 2008


Dakis Joannou’s Jeff Koons-designed yacht ‘Guilty’ via Artforum

Art luminaries gather on collector Dakis Joannou’s Jeff Koons-designed yacht in Greece [artforum]
Study: number of US artists tripled since 70’s to 2 million with $34,800 average income [artinfo]
A profile of contemporary German collector Falckenberg and his 2,000 works [Bloomberg]
Early Hirst painting disgarded to thrift shop by mistake [The Independent]
The NYTimes reviews Lichtenstein at Gagosian uptown NY [NYTimes]
New Museum announces 1st US Elizabeth Peyton survey show [New Museum]
Market uncertainty, Christie’s competition cited in 12% quarterly profit drop for Sotheby’s [the Art Newspaper]

Newslinks: Monday June 16th, 2008

Monday, June 16th, 2008

Anish Kapoor via Time

Time Magazine on Anish Kapoor [Time]
–>
Tracey Emin’s controversial selections for Royal Academy include zebra bestiality, closeups of masturbation during menstruation, and barbed wire hula-hooping [The Daily Mail]
–>
Separately, Hirst invited to join Royal Academy, and has yet to reply [[TimesUK]
–>
Banksy friend/street artist Nick Walker to tag undisclosed British landmarks with laser [Artinfo]
–>
Private art insurance premiums jump 30% year on year [Wall Street Journal]
–>
Salander furniture/antique sale garners $1.6 million [Bloomberg]
–>
The Met is closer to a new Director [New York Sun]
–>
The Vatican begins a contemporary art initiative[the Independent]

Remarks at a Democratic National Committee luncheon in Rancho Santa Fe, California: September 26, 1998. (Pres. Bill Clinton)(Transcript)

Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents October 5, 1998 Thank you very much. Well, if I had any sense I wouldn’t say anything. [Laughter] Thank you, Bill. Thank you, Star. Thank you, Len. And all of you, I can’t tell you how much I appreciate you being here. I’m delighted to see Lynn Schenk, and I’m delighted to see Christine Kehoe. And we are determined to see her prevail. If you want to do something for what you just stood up for, send her to Congress. Send her to Congress.

I’d also like to thank all of you who have been my friends over the years, and some of you whom I have just met today, I am very grateful to see you here. I’d like to thank all the people who are responsible for our wonderful meal and the terrific musicians. Let’s give them a hand. Didn’t they do a great job? Thank you. [Applause] The Wayne Foster Group. Thank you so much. Bless you.

It’s nice to be here in this humble little house. [Laughter] This is the first place I’ve ever been where the fish are worth more than I make in a year. [Laughter] Listen, I want to say, this is really a magnificent home. It’s a real tribute to the work that Bill has done over the years and to the feeling that they have for all of us that they open their home to us. And I’m very grateful to be here.

I will be brief. I’ve had a remarkable couple of days. I was in Chicago yesterday, which most of you know is my wife’s hometown. And I got my Sammy Sosa Chicago Cubs baseball shirt, which was promptly taken away from me last night when I met up with Hillary and Chelsea in northern California.

Hillary has been up in Washington and Oregon and San Francisco campaigning, made an appearance last night for Barbara Boxer up there. And I’m here, and I’ll be in Los Angeles tonight and tomorrow. I’m going on to El Paso and San Antonio, Texas, and then I’m going back to Washington on Sunday night to try to bring to a closure this session of Congress with some productive action. But I cannot tell you how much it means to me not only as your President but as a person, what you have said here and what I have seen all across this country. And I’m grateful, and my family is grateful, and I thank you.

But there is something far bigger than all of us at stake here, and that is our country, our system, and where we’re going. And I tell everybody who comes up to me worrying about this, that the real enemy of our party and our principles and our programs and the direction of the country is not adversity. Adversity is our friend. It inspires us to action. It gives energy. It gives us steel and determination. Our real enemy is complacency, or cynicism. in our site rancho santa fe

You know, things are going pretty well for our country now, and I’m very grateful that I had a chance to be President, to implement the policies that I ran on that I talked about 6 years ago, I think, this month, when I was here with Bill and Star at their previous home. I’m grateful that we’ve got the lowest unemployment rate in 28 years and the lowest crime rate in 25 years and the smallest percentage of people on welfare in 29 years. And in just a few days, less than a week now, we’ll have the first balanced budget and surplus in 29 years. I’m grateful for that.

But the question is, what are we going to do with it? I’m grateful that we’ve opened the doors of college to virtually anybody now who will work for it with tax credits and the deductibility of student loans and more scholarships and work-study positions and that we added 5 million kids to the ranks of those with health insurance, passed the Brady bill and the Family Medical Leave Act. I’m grateful for all that.

But what are we going to do with it? What are we going to do with it? That’s really what’s at issue here. Our friends in the Republican Party believe they’re going to win in the midterms, first of all, because they wanted me – [At this point, birds began chirping in the background.] I don’t mind the birds; it’s just background music. [Laughter] Believe me, I’ve had worse background music lately. [Laughter] The Republicans believe they’re going to do well in these elections, first of all, because in every single election since the Civil War, with the President in his second term, the President’s party has always lost seats at midterm. The second thing they’re banking on is money. Even though you’ve been very generous and you’ve come here, they always have more money than we do, especially now that they’re in the majority. But we have something that money can’t buy and that history can’t overcome: We are on the right side of the issues for America’s future.

The history we want to make tomorrow and the next day and the next 10 or 20 years is the right history for America. And all we have to do is to get enough of our people to understand that, to get enough energy, out there, to get enough people to show up on election day, and all the history in the world won’t make a difference, and all the money in the world they have won’t turn the tide. Because people now know that when it came to the budget vote in 1993, which reduced the deficit by 93 percent before we had the bipartisan Balanced Budget Act, we didn’t have a single Republican vote. They know we barely had any votes for the crime bill when we banned assault weapons and put 100,000 police on the street, or for the Brady bill. They know that we had almost all – and Democratic votes, barely any Republican votes, for the family and medical leave law.

And if you look at the last year, when this country has had lots of challenges, and we had the resources to meet them, what has happened in this Congress in the last year? They’ve killed the tobacco legislation, to which Bill alluded. They’ve killed campaign finance reform. They have taken no action on my education program. The other night, in a breathtaking move, the Republican leader of the United States Senate actually had to shut the Senate down and make people go away for 4 hours because it was the only way to keep them from voting on the Patients’ Bill of Rights. And he knew if we ever got a vote, one of two things was going to happen. It was either going to pass, or they were going to be punished for killing it – for the insurance companies that wanted to kill it. So what did they do? They shut the place down. Unprecedented!

Now, what this is really about, this election, is not what’s going on in Washington, DC; it’s what’s going to go on in the lives of the people in San Diego and El Paso and Racine, Wisconsin, and the Northeast Kingdom in Vermont and all the places in the country where the people live who send people to Washington, DC. That’s what really matters.

And there is a very clear choice about what to do with this moment, and I think – if you just think about the things we need to do right now to prepare for America’s future – I’ll just mention five very quickly. Number one, we’re going to have a balanced budget and a surplus on October 1st for the first time in 29 years. They voted in the House and may vote in the Senate for a tax cut to start spending the surplus right away.

Now, I remind you, we quadrupled the debt of the country between 1981 and 1993, when I took office. These surpluses in the years ahead – they say, “Oh well, we know we’re going to have them, so we can spend some now, and it’s 4 or 5 weeks before the election, and won’t that be popular to just dish out a tax cut right here before the election.” And it’s the Democratic Party that’s standing up for fiscal responsibility and saying, no, and I’m saying no. And I’ll tell you why.

First of all, we have waited for 29 years. We have worked for 6 years to get out of this terrible hole. I would just like to see the red ink turn to black and watch the ink dry for a minute or two before we run another deficit. Wouldn’t you like to see that? Wouldn’t you just like to see the ink dry? [Applause] You know, they didn’t want to wait a day just to enjoy this incredible achievement. Now, why is that important? Because we’ve got a lot of trouble in the world today in the word economy. I was up in Silicon Valley last night where they understand how dynamic things are. They live in a perpetual state of change there. But so do we all, and we dare not forget it. We forget it at our peril.

We have to set a standard if we want to keep growing this economy that America, of all the countries in the world, is the most solid, the most sensible, the strongest country in the world.

The second reason we shouldn’t spend that surplus right now is that, before you know it, the baby boomers will begin to retire, starting in about 10 years. I’m the oldest of the baby boomers. People between the ages of 34 and 52, when we all retire, there will only be about two Americans working for every American drawing Social Security. Unless something totally unforeseen happens to the birth rate or the immigration rate, it will be about two to one.

The Social Security system today alone keeps half of the seniors in this country out of poverty; that is, without it, 50 percent of the seniors in this country would be in poverty, even with their other sources of income. Now, if we begin today and make modest changes, we can preserve the universal character of Social Security in the sense that it’s a bottom line safety net for people that don’t fall into poverty. But we can increase the returns, make some other changes, and avoid putting an unconscionable burden on our children and grandchildren.

I’m telling you, everybody I know my age is worried about this. I was home a few months ago and I had a barbecue about 6 o’clock in the evening with about 20 people I grew up with – most of them are just middle class Americans, don’t make much money. Every one of them said they were plagued with the thought that their retirement would be a burden to their children and their grandchildren. They’re not wealthy people. They know they’re not going to have enough. But they are plagued with the thought that they will have to take money away from their children and grandchildren.

Now, we have worked for 29 years for this. It’s the right thing to do, anyway, right now because of all the instability in the world, for us to stay strong and have this strong economy and have this little surplus. But secondly, it’s the right thing to do before we – I’m not against tax cuts. We have some tax cuts in our budget, but they’re all paid for. But before we get into that surplus for tax cuts, before we spend a penny of it for new programs, we ought to save the Social Security system for the 21st century, so that we do not either run a lot of seniors into poverty, or undermine the welfare of their children and grandchildren. It is terribly important.

That’s a big issue that affects people who live outside Washington, DC. The second big issue – it’s very important – again related to the economy, is I’m doing everything I can to limit the financial turmoil in Asia now, to begin to reverse it, and to keep it from spreading to Latin America which are our biggest markets, our fastest growing markets for American goods and services – everything I possibly can to sort of right this instability in the international financial system that you see most pronounced in Asia and Russia now but could affect our welfare. Alan Greenspan said the other day, more eloquently than I could, America could not forever be an island of prosperity. For us to grow over the long run, our friends and neighbors all across the world, on every continent, who are doing the right thing and working hard need to be doing better as well. That’s what this International Monetary Fund issue is all about.

For 8 months I have been pleading with Congress just to pay our fair share of the International Monetary Fund so we’ll have the money to stop the financial virus before it spreads across the globe and begins to bite us. That’s a big issue, and it hasn’t been done yet.

The third thing I want to say is we will never be permanently secure in this kind of economy until we can say not only that we have the best system of higher education in the world, but that every one of our children, without regard to race or income or neighborhood, has access to a world-class elementary and secondary education.

And for 8 months I have had before the Congress, fully paid for in the balanced budget, a bill that would lower class sizes to an average of 18 in the early grades and put another 100,000 teachers out there to teach them; that would build or repair another 5,000 schools because the schools are overcrowded; that would hook all the classrooms in the country up to the Internet by the year 2000; that would build 3,000 more charter schools – an issue that California has been on the forefront of – that would, in short, keep us on the forefront of education. It would also reward school districts that have poor performance and a lot of kids in trouble if they’ adopted high standards, accountability, no social promotion, but actually helped the kids, and didn’t denominate them as failures when they’re young and they are no such thing.

I was in Chicago the other day. Chicago used to be the poster child of a bad, failing, urban school district. I went to the Jenner Elementary School, where every single child lives in Cabrini-Green, one of the toughest public housing projects in all of America. In the last 3 years, their reading scores have doubled and their math scores have tripled. Chicago has a “no social promotion” policy, but if you fail, they don’t just say you’re a failure. They say you didn’t pass the test, and you have to go to summer school. The Chicago summer school now is the sixth biggest school district in America. [Laughter] Guess what’s happened to juvenile crime in Chicago. There are now 40,000 kids in that city that get 3 square meals a day in the school. So that’s also in our plan, funds for other troubled districts to follow that model.

We also have funds for 35,000 young people to pay for their college education, and then they can go out and work it off by teaching in underserved areas. This is a good program. That’s an issue in this election. It matters to you and to your future and to your children’s future and to your grandchildren’s future whether we can rescue, revive, and make excellent the public educational opportunities of every child in this country.

So those are three things: saving Social Security, stabilizing the global economy, putting education first.

I’ll just mention two others. Number one, one of the biggest fights I have all the time, convincing people on both sides, is that America has to find a way to protect the environment and grow the economy, and that if we have to choose one or the other, we’re in deep trouble. We have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars complying with subpoenas from a congressional committee that doesn’t want me to give tax incentives and spend research and development dollars to figure out how to grow the economy and reduce C[O.sub.2] emissions. And that’s out of step with the rest of the world.

I was in San Bernardino County not very long ago with the head of the National Association of Home Builders at a low-income housing project, where they had solar reflectors on the roof that are so thin now they look like ordinary shingles, and glass that keeps out 40 percent of the heat and cold and dramatically reduces the power cost. And it improves economic growth. It creates jobs and improves the environment – big issue. this web site rancho santa fe

But believe me, the budget I’m about to get, unless they change their tune, is going to be riddled with things designed to deny that and to weaken our environment.

And finally, to me the thing that embodies as much as anything else the great philosophical difference that’s at stake now in Washington is the debate over the Patients’ Bill of Rights. Now, let me set the stage. There are 160 million Americans in managed care plans. I have been a supporter of managed care. Why? Because when I became President, health care costs were going up at 3 times the rate of inflation. It was unsustainable. We were going to bankrupt the country. There wouldn’t be enough money left to spend on anything else.

But it’s like anything else – if the bottom line is just whether you save money rather than the bottom line of saving as much money as you can consistent with the health of the people that are being treated, you get in trouble.

And now many, many managed care plans have health care decisions made by insurance company accountants, and you have to appeal to two levels up or more until you finally get to a doctor. Our bill, which has the support of 43 managed care companies who are doing this anyway and are being punished for it, says this – it says simply, if you get in an accident, you ought to be able to go to the nearest emergency room, not one that’s 5 or 10 miles because that’s the only one that happens to be covered by your plan. Number two, if your doctor says that he or she can no longer treat your condition and you need to see a specialist, you ought to be able to see one. Number three, if you work for a small business who changes providers, health care providers, at a given time during the year, you still shouldn’t have to change your doctor if you’re in the middle of a critical treatment.

Now, let me just graphically demonstrate what that means. This happens. These things happen. You remember when you had your first child. How would you feel if you were 7 months pregnant and your employer says, “I’m sorry, go get another obstetrician”? If anybody in your family has ever had chemotherapy – I’ve been through that – if your family member needs chemotherapy, you sit around thinking; you try to figure out ways to make jokes about it. My mother stood there thinking, “Well, maybe I won’t lose my hair, or when I do, maybe I will finally get a wig.” I never had to – you think – you try to be funny about it. And then you wonder whether you’re going to be too sick to eat, right? In the middle of a chemotherapy treatment, do you think somebody would say, “I’m sorry, go get another doctor”? That’s what this is about – basic things.

Our bill also protects the privacy of your medical records, which I think is very, very important and will become more important in the years ahead.

Now, the House of Representatives, the Republican majority passed a bill that guarantees none of these rights and leaves 100 million Americans out of what little it does cover. The Senate wouldn’t even vote on the bill because they didn’t want to be recorded, so they shut down business.

That’s what this election is about. Don’t be fooled about a smokescreen. This election is: Are we going to have a Patients’ Bill of Rights? Is our policy going to be to grow the economy and preserve the environment? Are we going to put education first? Are we going to stabilize the global economy, so we can continue to grow? Are we going to save Social Security first? That’s what it’s about.

And if we go out and say, we are Democrats, this is what we’re running for; we believe elections should be about the people that live outside Washington, not about who’s crawling on whom in Washington, DC – everything is going to be fine. So I ask you, go out there and make sure that’s what it’s about.

Thank you very much.

NOTE: The President spoke at 3:35 p.m. at a private residence. In his remarks, he referred to luncheon hosts William S. and Star Lerach; Leonard Barrack, national finance chair, Democratic National Committee; Lynn Schenk, candidate for State attorney general; and San Diego City Council member Christine Kehoe, candidate for California’s 49th Congressional District.

Newslinks: Tuesday June 10th, 2008

Tuesday, June 10th, 2008


Olafur Eliassion courtesy of NY Mag

The technics of Olafur Eliasson’s upcoming falls project [NY Mag]
Christie’s, Sothebys assert no collusion in recently dual increase in premiums [ArtInfo]
Toxic leak risk leads to armed guards of Hirst’s lamb at LACMA [LA Times]
Banksy contemporary Nick Walker sells $1.5M of street Art in London [Bloomberg]
Clemente works at the Gallery Met at Lincoln Center [New York Times]
$21M record sale of Latin American art at Sotheby’s [ArtDaily]

Newslinks: Tuesday June 3rd, 2008

Tuesday, June 3rd, 2008

Dasha Zhukova via daylife

26-year old “Dasha” Zhukova building Moscow contemporary space backed by billionaire Roman Abramovich (recent global record buyer of Freud and Bacon) [artinfo]
More on David Byrne ‘playing the building’ in New York [NY mag]
Turner Prize-winner Mark Wallinger may build 164 ft horse in Kent, UK for ‘Angel of the South’ project [Guardian.co.uk]
Christie’s Paris sells Louise Bourgeois spider for record $4.5M [Bloomberg]
A revisit of the Young British Artist Freeze show after 20 years [Guardian.co.uk]

Newslinks: Monday, June 2, 2008

Monday, June 2nd, 2008


Jake and Dinos Chapman via Telegraph UK

Jake, Dinos Chapman directing comedy on the art world [Telegraph UK]
Hedge-Funder Sender’s curator predicts art market “shakeout” [Bloomberg]
A Kehinde Wiley audio interview [Nat. Portrait Gallery via Norlos.com]
Julian Schnabel interviewed on the topic of film [Telegraph UK]
Waves of Russians buying choice contemporary treasures [Times UK]

Newslinks: Saturday May 30, 2008

Sunday, June 1st, 2008

Leonard Lauder via The New York Times

Lauder Steps Down as Whitney Chair [NY Times, Art Forum]
“The primary market has only one event, and that is Art Basel” [Bloomberg]
A look at the work of the Guggenheim’s Chief Conservator [NySun]
An Interview with Nan Goldin in her Paris home [The GuardianUK]

Newslinks: Sunday – May 25th, 2008

Sunday, May 25th, 2008


Kauffman Desert House in Palm Springs via greatbuildings

Christie’s auction of Neutra house didn’t actually close [NYTimes]
Recent auction results belie underlying market weakness [Economist]
Herzog & de Meuron to design Kolkata Museum of Modern Art [ArtForum]
Ukranians as a new force in art buying [Financial Times]
A financial take on the state of the art market [TheStreet.com]
Guggenheim and Met hunt for museum heads [New York Sun]